Monthly Archives: October 2007


“Were we so different? They’re a young species. They have much to learn. But I’ve seen goodness in them. Freedom is the right of all sentient beings. You all know there’s only one way to end this war. We must destroy the cube. If all else fails, I will unite it with the spark in my chest.”

- Optimus Prime.

Okay, so it’s fair game to say that the above quote is quite literally the deepest thing in Transformers, but really who cares? When you have huge robots, big guns, cool gadgets and a bombastic soundtrack is it all that necessary to expect (or want) a prolific storyline with mind-boggling questions about anything and everything? I say no Sir, no no no…

The film itself is summer fluff, no? Built to make us go “Oooo, look at that massive ‘bot smash into that other massive ‘bot!” Toss in a few men in uniforms and a hot jail bait teenager (or two I guess) and you have yourself a pretty typical action flick for the kids, geeks, men-who-love-guns, Chevy-enthusiasts and anyone else who doesn’t spend their time knitting sweaters for fun in the sun.

I’m not going into details (the three there are) but I enjoyed it. I didn’t expect much so I have no complaints unlike those I suspect were looking for the next best thing after Star Wars and although I heard many complaints about the robots speaking all I have to say is, Huh? They spoke in the cartoons and the cartoon-movie in the ’80’s so why wouldn’t they now? Optimus Prime’s voice is synonymous amongst fans of the original so to leave it out would be like having He-Man without Skeletor… crazy.

The same applies to the humans. Focus more on the robots? Leave out the people? I doubt that would make it any better. We needed the people to simply give us a breath and some prologue… epilogue… reason… pseudo-plot… connection … basically they were the glue.

The effects were sound. So sound it was impressive to see an Autobot and a Decepticon go toe-to-toe without it looking totally green-screen. The transformations were up to par and the acting/script was about the usual for, again, a summer flick (especially one made by Michael Bay and Steven Spielberg) so no complaints.

Shia LeBeouf though… not sure what the big deal about the kid is to be honest. Yeah, he had good timing but so does Jerry Seinfeld however I don’t see that making Jerry the next big acting superstar (did make him enough money to roll in though…).

To sum it up and to explain the lack of plot for the overall experience I’ll let the Witwicky family quote say it all,

“No sacrifice, no victory.”


So there’s this thing called trust. It’s a simple affair really, one between your strength of character, your nature and the quietly residing layer of respect given by another. Trust lives in us all, be it the good kind or his close cousin, mistrust. The problem with trust though is that it can be gained, lost, sacrificed or just not accepted at all. These things are somewhat acceptable in the myriad number of events and circumstances that lead to the status of trust between us but when its flaunted and abused like something easily disposable it can quickly lead to a vacuum of self-doubt and unintentional/intentional disrespect.

Some people don’t trust, that’s fine. These people may take it upon themselves to put people through a series of tests before they open up any layers and begin to lend some belief in what another is saying. Others trust straight away without doubt, this is a little more dangerous but can lend itself to an overwhelming feeling of accomplishment when that trust is returned and heartfelt.

Then there are those who find a healthy level of trust, which is usually coupled with respect and the education of learning what somebody is like. This is the most common I feel. The one where those who understand each other trust because it’s the reward gained from constant respect and the notable lack of abuse. This is the kind I believe in the most as blindly walking into something is questionable but also demonstrating a Godlike want for all to perform like monkeys is pure craziness.

Marriage ascertains a certain degree of trust. Most would hope that a relationship so devoted that children can be spawned – and loved – so effectively would cement a divine trust and respect between those involved. To have a child is to create life and those who create life should be the mothers and fathers our children look up to. Thus, no abuse should ever be forthcoming of this trust, this co-habitation of two lives mutually dedicated to establishing the roots of a family (or merging with them) and raising seeds to forests.

But then this is my view, one of billions. The idea of this notion is merely that in itself, a notion built upon my self-educated view of what a lifetime with others entails. Respect, I think that’s the defining benchmark of trust and its foundations. To respect someone and place some of your own fragility in their hands is another divinity in the world, especially in these times. But do we baulk and flex when we suspect something is off? Do we shudder the foundations to such a degree that respect seemingly turns to ashes and the question of one’s character is raised?

This is the issue I have with those who find themselves guilty of pledging themselves to serve a future together only to offer up this trust quicker than the sun turns to dark. One question, or even less and the respect becomes a biting shard in the side. Stupid frivolities become poison in the minds of the scared to such a degree that the fearful turn their apprehension and suspicion (as unfounded as it may be) on those they love and fear loosing.

The overwhelming downside to all of this is of course the plague that begins to infect the relationship and the foundations. What we have done falls into the fire: hard work, children and our love of them, want, choice, dedication and love again for our partners… the facets of our relationships are insurmountable. But still, these things can be shot down and deflated with the simplest of abuse. If we start to use trust and quote it like an old poem it becomes nothing more than a tactic or even worse, a shadow of what it once was and little more than another thing lost in the fire.

Insidiousness in the way it works, it also questions our faith in others and our very nature and character. We begin to question ourselves as ridiculous as that may be even when faced with nothing more than suspicions and off hand remarks designed to hurt us, perhaps, or to just help an accuser defend themselves pro-actively. The worst thing in this labour is the disrespect and loyalty lost. Something gets eaten away and we’re left with self-doubt as I mentioned before. We become self-concious, concerned that we may do something that warrants suspicion as innocent as they may be.

It’s simply unfair. To have to act a certain way or quieten those things that tend to make another worry just to keep them from the very worrying we know they’ll have anyway. We continue on as normal, but like lights in the fog some things raise stupid questions and unwarranted accusations to the point of ridicule.

In my view those who find themselves suspicious should sit down and think about their motives and what the hell it is they have to be suspicious about. Weigh the one-side against the other, the pros and cons, the gains and loses and really think hard about what it is they’re asking. If I were them I think I would do this before I even open my mouth and even when I do it would be to speak with them and not to accuse with a harrowing pointed finger or an off hand comment.

It hurts to be mistrusted, to have someone question your character and to question your devotion to something you love more than life. Every time someone shows a little distrust in you it’s like a slap in the face. If we show you respect and never question your motives when doing things – on the sole basis that we trust you and believe in you and ‘us’ – then the least you could do is return the gesture.


One of the most notable things I’ve noticed since moving to the United States from Europe and specifically England is good media… or rather, the lack thereof.

I personally think the problem is the pseudo-xenophobic predetermination of the general media. Simply put, instead of approaching something to report on it effectively to the point that the general public is educated on the subject, the media – neutered as they are in recent times – simply does not approach these subjects because they explain the true vision of a world outside our own… an uglier world we, as the people, do not need to see apparently. This decision is not ours, but it is made by the people who control the information. Information, as always, is power – whether it’s what you know, or what you simply do not.

The media decides instead to focus on the generic, the unimportant and often downright ridiculous. What fruit is on sale, where you can get the newest and fancier car and ultimately what the celebrities are doing. Celebrities, you can conclude, are the media-perpetuated ‘distraction’ that those who seek to censor us use to such a degree it’s almost suffocating.

What colour is Timberlake’s hair? Where is Matt Lauer? What did Kanye West say when he didn’t get any VMA awards? You don’t know? Oh my… you need to pay attention to the honest-recessive news corporations who seek to imbue their public image with these often uninteresting facets of western society.

The basic point is, the truth is out there. We can find it, but we have to search for it. The internet is a likely spouse in this endeavour (unless you live in China and want to know what your government is doing, something in which Microsoft and Google help to censor and control via China-specific agreements to help the communists keep their people under the hammer). Another is outside sources. We can use the BBC to keep abreast of what is really happening outside our walls – I mention them because, in all the media-related communities the BBC s still the world’s best in my view. Heck, even newspaper (broadsheet not tabloid) can tell us a lot of recent events.

We can find out what’s happening (if we want to know) by looking for it. It’s just unfortunate that in a society tht prides itself on equality and freedom of speech we are constantly, as a people, put down and strapped up by our lack of general knowledge when it comes to the world beyond our front step. Children are still starving, women raped and men murdered… nothing has changed beyond what channel four or five tell you. The planet is still in decay and our blindness – voluntary or not – is still a damning trait to incur because we simply listen to what we’re being told.

The next time we see something coming up on our ‘respected’ news channel that displays nothing more than a want for glamour, glitz and the usual crap that comes with it turn the damn channel or simply shut it off. That crap belongs on E! – a channel that ironically does a good job of giving a true vista of what it’s demographical audience is looking for. Your news should be telling you what’s going on, so that you may want to act and do something to help… or even to have a view and vocalise it.

But wait, I have just realised… that’s the point in isn’t it. They don’t want us to have an opinion or act. The last thing a crumbling government-controlled media needs is somebody speaking up and saying, “TELL US THE TRUTH!”


Ladies and Gentlemen I introduce you to Mystery (right). This is a man with skills, a man with ‘mojo’. This is what we might call, a Pick-Up Artist – DO NOT LOOK INTO HIS EYES, for if you do you will be hypnotised and there will be no hope.

I stumbled across a program on Vh1 a while ago (thanks to my wife who finds an odd amount of enjoyment from these kinds of shows) and found myself dumbfounded by what I was witnessing.

It seems someone has tapped into an underground society that I was not aware of – call me backward – called the ‘Seduction Community’. It that revolves around the eternal skill of picking up women and making yourself look like a complete twat. I thought this was just what guys did, and have done for thousands of years. I thought it was called, ‘being desperate’. It seems I was a mile off.

Indeed the world of the Pick-Up Artist is far from a rudimentary voyage into the pants of an intoxicated eighteen-year old. Nay, you must master the ‘Art’ using a whole assortment of tricks taught by such leaders in the field as Mystery or either of his top students, Matador (suave pimp, left of Mystery) and J-Dog (pick a single hair colour, bro, right
of Mystery).

With this tutor and his ‘Wing Men’ you will learn a host of techniques. Revel in the ‘demonstration of high value’ (DHV) where, although you wish to know the
chick… sorry, the cmmunity calls them the ‘target’, you have to show that you can walk away any time – wow. Marvel in the new hairdo you’ve been given which will likely be two-toned, emo-styled, quaffed or simply spiked up to make you look thirteen. Flash your new look off which will consist of either, A) tight jeans and a casual jacket, B) emo (again), or C) a man-whore suit with a large collar.

Once befitted with these physical alterations and emotional ‘cool’ gadgets and mad skills you will be able to do such things as ‘bounce’ a target. This consists of moving the target from their current place (the club they are enjoying with friends) to the place you want them to go (a shitty curry house where you’ll give them diarrhea). You will be able to use ‘kino’, which is a cool society way of saying kinaesthetics (touch) to gain your perverted and selfish wants.

Do not fear though, there is more than just the physical. You can showcase such winning lines as, “Did you see the fight outside? Two girls were fighting over a guy named George,” to “Would you date a guy who keeps a picture of his ex in his wallet?” or even the ever popular, “Think of a number between one and ten…” Yes they are all here folks and surprisingly with enough groove you can turn these turgid, embarrassing, self-deprecating lines of excrement into a hook on which to catch your bait. Beware though, you might find yourself with someone who’s IQ matches a puddle of snot.

Alas, it’s a good laugh to watch World of Warcraft geeks being turned into… well, pimps and slimy bastards and thinking it’s somehow going to rejuvenate their lives and give it purpose. I hate to break it to them, but what are they going to do AFTER they have the ‘target’?

The show in question has done nothing to build upon the ‘after’ and only concentrates on the present and nailing, trapping, stalking, luring the poor innocent hammered blonde these guys set their attentions too. I’m curious, do they doll themselves up just to blow it when they introduce their blurry-eyed captive to Mom or their Magik card collection? It seems a little questionable in essence: to teach the men to hunt, but not how to prepare and cook the kill.

Witness the below:

Pre-nurturing = sad bastard, whilst post-artistry = the shit

I shit you not, there is a dictionary of Pick-Up terms with their own
definitions and here’s what I could catch from the TV show:

AVATAR- personal image, who and what you are
KINO – kinaesthetics, touch, stroking etc
DHV – Demonstrating High Value, show that you can walk away (not a lonely bastard)
DLV – Demonstrating Lower Value, looking pathetic (you are a lonely bastard)
PEA-COCKING – wearing nice clothes, jewellery, showing some game
LOCK-IN – to control the situation
HEALTH INDICATOR – a nice tan, nice skin, nice hair
SET – opening a conversation, entering and controllin a situation
TARGET – the centre of your focus, the woman
BOUNCE – to move the target from one place to another
NEGS – a backhanded comment to give a false indicator and lower a target’s self esteem
ROLL-OFF – to leave a situation behind and bail
IOI – Indicator of Interest, show you’re interested
STACKING – weaving conversations and multi-tasking recourse